Discussion about this post

User's avatar
dd's avatar
Jul 15Edited

About 30 years ago I decided to read Discipline and Punish, and because I can read French, I read it in French.

Foucault is a master of French rhetoric and the writing is clear and often as gorgeous and intense as you will find in Proust or St. Augustine.

HOWEVEVER, the sophistry is so thick. As example, he never can make a judgement as to whether the old fashion of punishment via ritualized torture is better or worse than the carceral one. Instead he side steps it by writing something to the effect of, "Donc, une supplice et un emploi du temps." (i.e. torture and a time-table).

I will not forget that he died in 1984 from the ravages of AIDS, habitue that he was of S&M bars in San Francisco and New York City. And he died in a hospital, which around 1960 he had examined (skewered) in La Naissance de la Clinique.

Expand full comment
Alexander Kurz's avatar

This is interesting:

"consistently reducing ethical considerations to simply the elucidation of power structures. This is the path that much of the humanities academy has since taken,"

I am wondering whether this is related to the opposite phenomenon of expunging power structures from social sciences such as economics.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts